BIP 100: Dynamic maximum block size by miner vote
Consensus (hard fork), Specification, Closed. By Jeff Garzik, Tom Harding, Dagur Valberg Johannsson. First discussed on the list 12 Jun 2015; 29 threads and 765 messages in all.
The threads, in order
Listed by the date of each thread's first message.
2015 26 threads
- User vote in blocksize through fees Peter Todd42 messages
- Various block size proposals Bryan Bishop2 messages
- comments on BIP 100 Adam Back36 messages
- 29 messages
- Scope narrowing for proposals to address block size limit debate, an inquiry Odinn Cyberguerrilla1 message
- Concerns Regarding Threats by a Developer to Remove Commit Access from Other Developers Odinn Cyberguerrilla60 messages
- Fee Market Effects Tim Witters1 message
- Draft BIP : fixed-schedule block size increase Gavin Andresen62 messages
- BIP 102 - kick the can down the road to 2MB Jeff Garzik29 messages
- 10 messages
- Block size following technological growth Pieter Wuille111 messages
- A summary of block size hardfork proposals Johnson Lau3 messages
- Fees and the block-finding process Gavin Andresen93 messages
- Voting (BIP-100) Question, Etc. Odinn Cyberguerrilla2 messages
- Bitcoin XT 0.11A Mike Hearn47 messages
- Bitcoin XT Fork Satoshi Nakamoto62 messages
- Will there be a freeze of the current protocol version? Oliver Egginger2 messages
- Visualizations of Votes Odinn Cyberguerrilla11 messages
- Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max C Daniele Pinna1 message
- 26 messages
- Questiosn about BIP100 Andrew C5 messages
- Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap [BIP 1xx - Draft] Upal Chakraborty13 messages
- BIP 100 repo Jeff Garzik7 messages
- BIP 100 specification Jeff Garzik20 messages
- 1 message
- Consensus census Jonathan Toomim1 message
2016 2 threads
- New BIP editor, and request for information Luke Dashjr2 messages
- Fee smoothing Luzius Meisser5 messages
2017 1 thread
- 81 messages