BIP 62: Dealing with malleability
Consensus (soft fork), Specification, Closed. By Pieter Wuille. First discussed on the list 17 Jun 2014; 20 threads and 149 messages in all.
The threads, in order
Listed by the date of each thread's first message.
2014 6 threads
- Proposal: relax the IsStandard rules for P2SH transactions Gavin Andresen10 messages
- Small update to BIP 62 Pieter Wuille19 messages
- Signature with negative integer? Richard Moore2 messages
- Malleable booleans Pieter Wuille8 messages
- BIP62 and future script upgrades Pieter Wuille9 messages
- 18 messages
2015 12 threads
- Strict DER signatures Pieter Wuille32 messages
- Bitcoin Core 0.10.0 released Wladimir J. van der Laan2 messages
- 19 messages
- Bitcoin Core 0.11.0 released Wladimir J. van der Laan4 messages
- 4 messages
- The use of tx version field in BIP62 and 68 Johnson Lau3 messages
- Bitcoin dev meeting in layman's terms (2015-10-8) G1lius Caesar1 message
- Bitcoin Core 0.11.1 release candidate 2 available Wladimir J. van der Laan2 messages
- Bitcoin Core 0.10.3 release candidate 2 available Wladimir J. van der Laan1 message
- Bitcoin Core 0.11.1 released Wladimir J. van der Laan1 message
- Bitcoin Core 0.10.3 released Wladimir J. van der Laan1 message
- Dealing with OP_IF and OP_NOTIF malleability Johnson Lau7 messages
2016 2 threads
- Gavin: A Response to Your Forking BIP Bryan Bishop1 message
- New BIP: Low S values signatures Johnson Lau5 messages