Consensus Parameter
A network-wide rule or setting-like block size or difficulty-that all full nodes must follow for consensus.
A consensus parameter is any rule the protocol requires every full node to enforce identically. If two nodes disagree on a consensus parameter, they end up on different chains.
The major Bitcoin consensus parameters:
- Block weight limit. 4 million weight units. The post-SegWit replacement for the original 1 MB block size cap.
- Halving schedule. Subsidy halves every 210,000 blocks (~4 years), starting at 50 BTC and decreasing toward the 20,999,999.9769 BTC asymptote.
- Valid script opcodes and their semantics. Defined by the consensus implementation; what
OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFYdoes, whatOP_CHECKMULTISIGdoes, what's allowed in a SegWit witness, what's allowed in a Tapscript leaf. - Difficulty retarget rule. Every 2016 blocks, difficulty adjusts so the expected interval between blocks targets 10 minutes.
- Coinbase maturity. Newly-minted block rewards aren't spendable for 100 confirmations.
- Activation rules for soft forks. BIP 9 versionbits, Speedy Trial, BIP 8 - the rules for how new consensus parameters get activated are themselves a kind of meta-consensus parameter.
Changing a consensus parameter requires a coordinated soft fork (tightening rules, backwards-compatible) or a hard fork (loosening rules, splits the chain if not unanimous). The bar for either is high. Bitcoin's parameter set has been deliberately stable; substantive consensus changes have averaged maybe one per 2-4 years over the protocol's history (P2SH, CLTV, CSV, SegWit, Taproot).
That stability is itself a feature. Money's value comes partly from confidence that the rules won't change. A consensus parameter that's been unchanged for a decade tells holders something an arbitrary-policy chain can't.
Key takeaways
- Defines fundamental rules of block and transaction validity
- Changes risk chain splits if not broadly accepted
- Enforced by full nodes for network-wide agreement