Mining Pool
A collective of miners pooling their hash power and sharing rewards proportionally to contributed work.
A mining pool is a group of miners who combine their hash rate to find blocks together and split the rewards proportionally.
Why pools exist: variance. A miner with 0.01% of global hash rate would, on average, find one block every ~70 days - but the variance around that average is enormous. Some quarters they'd find three; some quarters zero. With electricity bills due every month, "averaged over years" is not a viable cash flow.
Pools fix this by aggregating many miners' hash power so blocks come more frequently (proportional to combined hash), and paying each contributor based on the "shares" of work they submit. Modern share schemes (PPLNS, FPPS) also defeat pool hopping - a historical exploit that gamed early-round shares to extract above-average rewards.
Over the year to October 2026, the four biggest pools - Foundry USA, AntPool, F2Pool and ViaBTC - found about 69% of all blocks, by mempool.space's count. This is the centralization concern that keeps Bitcoin developers up at night: if a few pool operators decide together to censor certain transactions, or to attempt a reorganization, they have the hash power to attempt it.
The counterweight is that pool operators are not miners. The hash rate in a pool comes from individual miners who can switch pools at will. If a pool starts misbehaving, miners can - and do - migrate elsewhere within hours. There's also work happening to push power back to individual miners: Stratum V2 is a protocol upgrade that lets miners (not pool operators) choose which transactions go into the blocks they're hashing on. It's been slow to deploy but is the structural fix.
On the operator side, the layer that actually manages pool connections, work distribution, and per-ASIC monitoring is the mining front-end - just stock firmware for a hobbyist with one ASIC, a dedicated fleet-management stack for industrial operators running thousands.
As of October 2026, the state of things is uncomfortable but not catastrophic. See Mining rabbit hole section 8 for a longer look at mining centralization and how it's actually evolving.
Key takeaways
- Combines resources for more consistent miner payouts
- Pool members receive shares of the block reward
- Can lead to centralization if few pools dominate
Related chapters
Corrected
-
Was: The entry said a miner with 0.1% of the global hash rate would find a block about every 70 days on average.
Now: At 0.1% the average is about one block a week. The example now uses 0.01%, which works out to about one block every 70 days, with some quarters bringing three blocks and some none. Details
Sources (1)
External references (3)
Related terms (16)
Published . Revised . One correction logged for this page.
Edit this page on GitHub