LearnBitcoin

Bitcoin Dev Archive 2015

Mailing List Moderation Now Active.

4 messages, 22 to 28 Oct 2015. Started by Rusty Russell.

Mike Hearn (2), Rusty Russell, xor

Permalink Original thread on gnusha.org

Rusty Russell permalink original

Hi all,

We aim to make the list more contentful and productive; to get devs to resubscribe we need to maximize high-value interactions.

  - Currently 5 moderators.  BtcDrak, me, G1lius, Kanzure and Johnathan.
    As far as I know we're entirely unconnected, and we cover Asia/Europe/US.
  - Moderation will last 3 months.  Then we'll have an unmoderated on-list
    discussion as to whether it should continue, or change.
  - Appeals for/against moderation decisions should be directed to Jeff, who
    will have final say.  General moderation feedback just send to me.
  - All rejected posts will be forwarded to a list for public viewing:
    https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/
  - Everyone starts moderated, and the mod bit gets cleared as they post.
    It gets set again if someone notices or reports a violation.
  - Moderation rules:
    - No offensive posts, no personal attacks.
    - Posts must concern the near-term development of the bitcoin core
      code or bitcoin protocol.
    - Posts must contribute to bitcoin development.
    - Generally encouraged: patches, notification of pull requests, BIP
      proposals, academic paper announcements.  And discussions that follow.
    - Generally discouraged: shower thoughts, wild speculation, jokes, +1s,
      non-technical bitcoin issues, rehashing settled topics without new
      data, moderation concerns.
    - Detailed patch discussion generally better on the GitHub PR.
    - Meta-discussion is better on bitcoin-discuss:
      https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-discuss
  - We will make mistakes, we are human, so please be patient.

Your friendly moderators.

Mike Hearn in reply to Rusty Russell permalink original
Quoted text (4 lines)
>
>     - Posts must concern the near-term development of the bitcoin core
>       code or bitcoin protocol.
>

Are block size discussions considered acceptable, then?

xor in reply to Rusty Russell permalink original

On Thursday, October 22, 2015 11:59:11 AM Rusty Russell via bitcoin-dev wrote:

Quoted text (2 lines)
>   - All rejected posts will be forwarded to a list for public viewing:
>     https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev-moderation/

They are not readable, they all say:

Quoted text (1 line)
> An embedded message was scrubbed...
Mike Hearn in reply to Mike Hearn permalink original

This post by Gavin got rejected by the moderators.

Without a doubt this moderation policy is already a disaster. I'm fully expecting this message to get rejected too, but so you can see it Rusty: so far in the reject bin there are messages from:

   - Well known uber-troll Gavin Andresen
   - And his partner in crime, Sergio Damian Lerner
   - Someone discussing a bug
   - Someone who wants to discuss CLTV
   - Someone pointing out that censorship of technical discussion is rarely
   a good idea
   - Someone pointing out that censorship of people complaining about
   censorship is also taking place.

WTF?