Taproot (and graftroot) complexity
2 messages, 19 to 20 Sep 2020. Started by Jay Berg.
Jay Berg, Lloyd Fournier
Newb here.. don’t know if "in-reply-to" header is misbehaving.
But this is the OP thread:
[bitcoin-dev] Taproot (and graftroot) complexity Anthony Towns aj at erisian.com.au Mon Feb 10 00:20:11 UTC 2020
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2020-February/017622.html
<a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev%40lists.linuxfoundation.org?Subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bbitcoin-dev%5D%20Taproot%20%28and%20graftroot%29%20complexity&In-Reply-To=%3C20200210002011.lelhcdmjejmoh6xv%40erisian.com.au%3E" title="[bitcoin-dev] Taproot (and graftroot) complexity">aj at erisian.com.au </a>
On 9/19/20, 5:35 AM, "bitcoin-dev on behalf of Jay Berg via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists•linuxfoundation•org on behalf of bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org> wrote:
Quoted text (2 lines)
> At the time you create a utxo, provided you don't reuse keys, all taproot
> spends are indistinguishable. At the time you spend a taproot utxo,does reusing keys act differently in taproot than with Pay-to-PubKey-Hash? Or is it the same deal.. same pubkey creates same address?
Question is: is the security/privacy implications worse when reusing pubkeys with taproot?
ty
jay
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-devHi Jay,
I don't think there's much of a difference in security or privacy. The advice to avoid key-reuse remains the same and for the same reasons.
LL
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 11:08 PM Jay Berg via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org> wrote:
Quoted text (37 lines)
> > Newb here.. don’t know if "in-reply-to" header is misbehaving. > > But this is the OP thread: > > [bitcoin-dev] Taproot (and graftroot) complexity > Anthony Towns aj at erisian.com.au > Mon Feb 10 00:20:11 UTC 2020 > > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2020-February/017622.html > > <a href="mailto:bitcoin-dev%40lists.linuxfoundation.org?Subject=Re:%20Re%3A%20%5Bbitcoin-dev%5D%20Taproot%20%28and%20graftroot%29%20complexity&In-Reply-To=%3C20200210002011.lelhcdmjejmoh6xv%40erisian.com.au%3E" title="[bitcoin-dev] Taproot (and graftroot) complexity">aj at erisian.com.au > </a> > > On 9/19/20, 5:35 AM, "bitcoin-dev on behalf of Jay Berg via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists•linuxfoundation•org on behalf of bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org> wrote: > > > > At the time you create a utxo, provided you don't reuse keys, all taproot > > spends are indistinguishable. At the time you spend a taproot utxo, > > does reusing keys act differently in taproot than with Pay-to-PubKey-Hash? Or is it the same deal.. same pubkey creates same address? > > Question is: is the security/privacy implications worse when reusing pubkeys with taproot? > > ty > jay > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev