On August 13, 2015 7:34:03 PM GMT+03:00, Nicolas Dorier via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org> wrote:
Quoted text (6 lines)
>Would be wonderful to have this pushed together with CLTV and BIP68.
>If BIP68 get pushed in the next fork, this CSV is a no brainer.
>
>Was there a competing RCLTV implementation somewhere that did not
>depend on
>BIP68 for information ? I don't manage to find it.
I think all such competing proposals are dropped because this seemed like a better idea. Feel free to revive one/come up with one, though.
Matt