Just FYI
4 messages, 22 Jun 2015. Started by Frank Flores.
Frank Flores (2), Peter Todd, Venzen Khaosan
If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public emails, please publish your public key on a major key server or at least somewhere where google can crawl it. Thank you.
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 08:14:04PM -0500, Frank Flores wrote:
Quoted text (3 lines)
> If you're going to go through the trouble of signing your public emails, > please publish your public key on a major key server or at least somewhere > where google can crawl it. Thank you.
As for how you can do that, on stock gnupg:
gpg --send-key 934023AE18144354
Or possibly:
gpg --keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net --send-key 934023AE18144354
If your gpg.conf doesn't have a keyserver set.
Note that if you add a new subkey (as well as other changes to your key) you need to resend your key to the keyservers or people won't be able to verify your signatures.
Disclaimer: OpenPGP kinda sucks. Deal with it.
Granted this is not the gnuPG support list, it would help me and most members, here, to know just a little more, following your gpg advice about publishing keys:
Say, subsequent to publishing a key to a keyserver, I then sign that key (or someone else signs it)
1) would the key need to be published again?
2) does the key used to sign it need to be published in order to make signature verification possible?
Venzen
On 06/22/2015 09:06 AM, Peter Todd wrote:
Quoted text (1 line)
> gpg --keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net --send-key
Whenever a public key is altered in any way it should be resubmitted/republished, so yes, please do so.
DO NOT PUBLISH YOUR PRIVATE KEY. That is the data used to sign a document. You only need to publish your PUBLIC KEY or otherwise share it with recipients of your signed message so that others can verify it as properly signed or not.
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Venzen Khaosan <venzen@mail•bihthai•net> wrote:
Quoted text (36 lines)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Granted this is not the gnuPG support list, it would help me and most > members, here, to know just a little more, following your gpg advice > about publishing keys: > > Say, subsequent to publishing a key to a keyserver, I then sign that > key (or someone else signs it) > > 1) would the key need to be published again? > > 2) does the key used to sign it need to be published in order to make > signature verification possible? > > Venzen > > > On 06/22/2015 09:06 AM, Peter Todd wrote: > > gpg --keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net --send-key > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1 > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVh6/4AAoJEGwAhlQc8H1mlL0IAIFZdzyzawOjc43SODLYePo6 > NJU+DRKCQLiNhiED/keCFR/t51XarY4dvgG81wr1qskckRarW6s2ZEWU/2l4oaHa > Ys+yO5ASbWOp9jbcBWIMFcAou+ULYx732wqEGTXOgSXljrSsuGa4DO+8vSW1UToc > kY6BhFUa9rjEUQXt+gUqfrXiFlgRFHY4/nd1Tk47VEBipZgcQsJr4j6SYhlXHfbb > CpixpFeIeVFfdHSNQiDMqPkF3xsTLQcqq2LvZpT8TXrA5vQ0wv/gZH49zIIy5QjR > xjmSb1tZl0GZRTZ3CYCsoK4Zq4BdhqdU8XIhlwACC2WXHFDnqQrTXwH4nLeWcG0= > =pYDp > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists•linuxfoundation•org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev >