LearnBitcoin

Bitcoin Dev Archive 2025

Draft BIP: Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint

4 messages, 26 May to 2 Jun 2025. Started by Aviv Bar-el.

hodlinator (2), Aviv Bar-el, Murch

Permalink Original thread on gnusha.org

Aviv Bar-el permalink original

Hi all,

I'd like to propose a new BIP titled "Well-Known Bitcoin Identity Endpoint." The goal is to improve the user experience for sending on-chain Bitcoin payments by allowing wallets to resolve a Lightning Address into associated on-chain addresses and additional metadata.

The idea is to define a simple, HTTPS-based standard for retrieving payment and contact information via a .well-known endpoint, generalizing the approach used by Lightning Address to support more payment types and identity metadata.

You can find the draft BIP here: https://github.com/aviv57/paysats/blob/main/bip/BIPXXX.MD

I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions.

Thanks, AvivB

hodlinator in reply to Aviv Bar-el permalink original

Hi AvivB,

Something similar has been discussed here in BIP 353: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0353.mediawiki#dns-rather-than-http-based-solutions

Cheers, Hodlinator

On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 2:52:02 PM UTC+2 Aviv Bar-el wrote:

Quoted text (21 lines)
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose a new BIP titled "Well-Known Bitcoin Identity
> Endpoint."
> The goal is to improve the user experience for sending on-chain Bitcoin
> payments by allowing wallets to resolve a Lightning Address into associated
> on-chain addresses and additional metadata.
>
> The idea is to define a simple, HTTPS-based standard for retrieving
> payment and contact information via a .well-known endpoint,
> generalizing the approach used by Lightning Address to support more
> payment types and identity metadata.
>
> You can find the draft BIP here:
> https://github.com/aviv57/paysats/blob/main/bip/BIPXXX.MD
>
> I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> AvivB
>
hodlinator in reply to hodlinator permalink original

(Reading further down in your proposal I see you do acknowledge BIP 353 and the arguments laid out there, sorry for the noise).

On Monday, June 2, 2025 at 3:54:05 PM UTC+2 hodlinator wrote:

Quoted text (32 lines)
> Hi AvivB,
>
> Something similar has been discussed here in BIP 353:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0353.mediawiki#dns-rather-than-http-based-solutions
>
> Cheers,
> Hodlinator
>
> On Monday, May 26, 2025 at 2:52:02 PM UTC+2 Aviv Bar-el wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'd like to propose a new BIP titled "Well-Known Bitcoin Identity
>> Endpoint."
>> The goal is to improve the user experience for sending on-chain Bitcoin
>> payments by allowing wallets to resolve a Lightning Address into associated
>> on-chain addresses and additional metadata.
>>
>> The idea is to define a simple, HTTPS-based standard for retrieving
>> payment and contact information via a .well-known endpoint,
>> generalizing the approach used by Lightning Address to support more
>> payment types and identity metadata.
>>
>> You can find the draft BIP here:
>> https://github.com/aviv57/paysats/blob/main/bip/BIPXXX.MD
>>
>> I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> AvivB
>>
>
Murch in reply to Aviv Bar-el permalink original

Hi Aviv,

Thanks for posting about your BIP idea. I must admit that I have lost track of the finer details of Lightning Addresses, LNURL, and other similar schemes, so I’m not in a position to comment on a comparison of your idea to those. One of the criticisms that I remember from when Lightning Address was first introduced was that it would have been better to avoid the email format. After glancing at your draft, I would like to suggest that you clarify how you propose that the paysats would be communicated. I would suggest staying clear of the email format, not only, because senders sometimes mistake it for an email address, but also because there are now other similar schemes that use email formatting already and it would not be clear which resolution to use when encountering it. Otherwise, this seems like a decent start of a BIP, although it would help if you lay out more clearly how your idea compares with similar schemes in the Rationale, in addition to what you already wrote about BIP 353.

Cheers,

Murch

On 5/26/25 05:50, Aviv Bar-el wrote:

Quoted text (28 lines)
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to propose a new BIP titled "Well-Known Bitcoin Identity
> Endpoint."
> The goal is to improve the user experience for sending on-chain
> Bitcoin payments by allowing wallets to resolve a Lightning Address
> into associated on-chain addresses and additional metadata.
>
> The idea is to define a simple, HTTPS-based standard for retrieving
> payment and contact information via a .well-known endpoint,
> generalizing the approach used by Lightning Address to support more
> payment types and identity metadata.
>
> You can find the draft BIP here:
> https://github.com/aviv57/paysats/blob/main/bip/BIPXXX.MD
>
> I’d appreciate any feedback or suggestions.
>
> Thanks,
> AvivB
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups•com.
> To view this discussion visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAEbZFSsA49mnsVia7L-0k9S%3Doa93nCN4KudHdK8ZnSbboenohw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAEbZFSsA49mnsVia7L-0k9S%3Doa93nCN4KudHdK8ZnSbboenohw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.