praxeology_guy
35 messages and 6 threads started, 28 Feb 2017 to 30 May 2017.
First post: TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful. Latest: Improvement Proposal.
Messages by year
| 2017 | 35 |
|---|
Writes about
Most active in
- Guessing the spentness status of the pruned relatives 5 of 9, 2017
- Inquiry: Transaction Tiering 3 of 15, 2017
- A Small Modification to Segwit 3 of 41, 2017
- A Better MMR Definition 2 of 29, 2017
- Hard fork proposal from last week's meeting 2 of 81, 2017
- Refund Excesss Fee Hard Fork Proposal 2 of 3, 2017
- BIP proposal: Inhibiting a covert attack on the Bitcoin POW function 2 of 49, 2017
- Praxeological Analysis of PoW Policy Changes, Re: ASICBOOST 2 of 2, 2017
- Draft BIP: Version bits extension with guaranteed lock-in 2 of 6, 2017
- I do not support the BIP 148 UASF 2 of 34, 2017
- Segwit v2 2 of 7, 2017
- TXO commitments do not need a soft-fork to be useful 1 of 6, 2017
- A Commitment-suitable UTXO set "Balances" file data structure 1 of 4, 2017
- Flag day activation of segwit 1 of 10, 2017
- Bandwidth limits and LN w/ node relay network topography 1 of 2, 2017
Threads started
Newest first.
2017 6 threads
- Wallet: A User Friendly Data Structure praxeology_guy1 message
- Praxeological Analysis of PoW Policy Changes, Re: ASICBOOST praxeology_guy2 messages
- Guessing the spentness status of the pruned relatives praxeology_guy9 messages
- Refund Excesss Fee Hard Fork Proposal praxeology_guy3 messages
- Bandwidth limits and LN w/ node relay network topography praxeology_guy2 messages
- 4 messages