LearnBitcoin

Bitcoin Dev Archive 2025

Elliptic Curve Operations for Bitcoin Script

3 messages, 25 Aug to 1 Sep 2025. Started by Olaoluwa Osuntokun.

Jeremy Rubin (2), Olaoluwa Osuntokun

Permalink Original thread on gnusha.org

Olaoluwa Osuntokun permalink original

Hi y'all,

I've just published a draft of a BIP to add Elliptic Curve operation op codes as a soft fork utilizing the existing Taproot infrastructure and current tap leaf version.

My primary motivation is enabling the commutation of the top level Taproot output public key within Bitcoin Script. Alongside introspection enabling op codes, this enables the creation of a new flavor of on-chain state machine within Bitcoin Script. The set of op codes is also generic enough to enable several other use cases related to (optimized DLCs, partial musig2 signature verification, EC based sigma protocols, etc).

A total of 4 op codes are proposed (each allocated from the existing
OP_SUCCESS) range:
  * `OP_EC_POINT_ADD`
  * `OP_EC_POINT_MUL`
  * `OP_EC_POINT_NEGATE`
  * `OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD`

The full BIP text can be found here: * https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1945

A reference implementation in `btcd` can be found here:
  * https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/pull/2413

--Laolu

Jeremy Rubin in reply to Olaoluwa Osuntokun permalink original

Interesting proposal and a great contrast of options v.s. OP_TWEAKADD. I have a few notes which might strengthen this proposal:

I would suggest adding an operation *OP_EC_LIFT_X_EVEN* which "undos" OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD (not perfectly because of parity). This is helpful if OP_IKEY is used.

I would also suggest adding *OP_EC_GENERATOR* which pushes G onto the stack, rather than taking a 0 to mean G. This is more composable, as presently you have:

<x: [u8;32]> <y : Either<0, [u8;33]> OP_EC_POINT_MUL -> Either<0, [u8;33]>

therefore scripts like:

<blah> SHA256 <[0; 32]> <0> OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EC_POINT_MUL

will return: h(blah) G

rather than more straightforwardly carrying the point at infinity onwards.

If you instead had OP_G:

<blah> SHA256 <[0; 32]> OP_EC_GENERATOR OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EC_POINT_MUL

will return: point at infinity

then you'd get more correct multiplication chaining.

This lets you implement OP_TWEAKADD as:

<H> OP_EC_GENERATOR OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_INTERNALKEY OP_EC_LIFT_X_EVEN OP_EC_POINT_ADD v.s. <H> OP_IKEY OP_TWEAKADD

Note: The BIP incorrectly gives:

<tweak> <empty_vector> OP_EC_POINT_MUL # tweak*G (33-byte) <internal_key> OP_EC_POINT_ADD # P + tweak*G (33-byte) OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD # Extract x-coordinate (32-byte)

the internal key, as specified, must be lifted first before adding.

On Sunday, August 24, 2025 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-4 Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote:

Quoted text (32 lines)
> Hi y'all,
>
> I've just published a draft of a BIP to add Elliptic Curve operation op
> codes
> as a soft fork utilizing the existing Taproot infrastructure and current
> tap
> leaf version.
>
> My primary motivation is enabling the commutation of the top level Taproot
> output public key within Bitcoin Script. Alongside introspection enabling
> op
> codes, this enables the creation of a new flavor of on-chain state machine
> within Bitcoin Script. The set of op codes is also generic enough to enable
> several other use cases related to (optimized DLCs, partial musig2
> signature
> verification, EC based sigma protocols, etc).
>
> A total of 4 op codes are proposed (each allocated from the existing
> OP_SUCCESS) range:
>   * `OP_EC_POINT_ADD`
>   * `OP_EC_POINT_MUL`
>   * `OP_EC_POINT_NEGATE`
>   * `OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD`
>
> The full BIP text can be found here:
>  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1945
>
> A reference implementation in `btcd` can be found here:
>   * https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/pull/2413
>
> --Laolu
>
Jeremy Rubin in reply to Jeremy Rubin permalink original

Noteworthy:

<zidx> PICK <G> OP_EC_POINT_MUL <yIDX> PICK <xidx> PICK <G> OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EQUALVERIFY gives the ability to do "naked" field multiplication, in addition to the intended EC_MUL.

Same with addition, and divide by a constant (AFAIU, via mul by inv), and any other prime field arithmetic tricks...

Therefore it may make sense to add to this proposal the raw field arithmetic opcodes (and perhaps u256 arith generally), as they are there somewhat implicitly otherwise.

As a distillable engineering principle/aphorism: what you enable, that might be used commonly, should be enabled efficiently.

Cheers,

Jeremy

On Monday, August 25, 2025 at 10:13:35 PM UTC-4 jeremy wrote:

Quoted text (88 lines)
> Interesting proposal and a great contrast of options v.s. OP_TWEAKADD. I
> have a few notes which might strengthen this proposal:
>
>
> I would suggest adding an operation *OP_EC_LIFT_X_EVEN* which "undos"
> OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD (not perfectly because of parity). This is helpful if
> OP_IKEY is used.
>
> I would also suggest adding *OP_EC_GENERATOR* which pushes G onto the
> stack, rather than taking a 0 to mean G. This is more composable, as
> presently you have:
>
>
> <x: [u8;32]> <y : Either<0, [u8;33]> OP_EC_POINT_MUL -> Either<0, [u8;33]>
>
> therefore scripts like:
>
> <blah> SHA256 <[0; 32]> <0> OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EC_POINT_MUL
>
> will return: h(blah) G
>
> rather than more straightforwardly carrying the point at infinity onwards.
>
> If you instead had OP_G:
>
> <blah> SHA256 <[0; 32]> OP_EC_GENERATOR OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_EC_POINT_MUL
>
> will return: point at infinity
>
> then you'd get more correct multiplication chaining.
>
>
> This lets you implement OP_TWEAKADD as:
>
>
> <H> OP_EC_GENERATOR OP_EC_POINT_MUL OP_INTERNALKEY OP_EC_LIFT_X_EVEN
> OP_EC_POINT_ADD
> v.s.
> <H> OP_IKEY OP_TWEAKADD
>
>
>
> Note: The BIP incorrectly gives:
>
> <tweak> <empty_vector> OP_EC_POINT_MUL  # tweak*G (33-byte)
> <internal_key> OP_EC_POINT_ADD           # P + tweak*G (33-byte)
> OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD                      # Extract x-coordinate (32-byte)
>
> the internal key, as specified, must be lifted first before adding.
>
>
>
> On Sunday, August 24, 2025 at 8:52:36 PM UTC-4 Olaoluwa Osuntokun wrote:
>
>> Hi y'all,
>>
>> I've just published a draft of a BIP to add Elliptic Curve operation op
>> codes
>> as a soft fork utilizing the existing Taproot infrastructure and current
>> tap
>> leaf version.
>>
>> My primary motivation is enabling the commutation of the top level Taproot
>> output public key within Bitcoin Script. Alongside introspection enabling
>> op
>> codes, this enables the creation of a new flavor of on-chain state machine
>> within Bitcoin Script. The set of op codes is also generic enough to
>> enable
>> several other use cases related to (optimized DLCs, partial musig2
>> signature
>> verification, EC based sigma protocols, etc).
>>
>> A total of 4 op codes are proposed (each allocated from the existing
>> OP_SUCCESS) range:
>>   * `OP_EC_POINT_ADD`
>>   * `OP_EC_POINT_MUL`
>>   * `OP_EC_POINT_NEGATE`
>>   * `OP_EC_POINT_X_COORD`
>>
>> The full BIP text can be found here:
>>  * https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/1945
>>
>> A reference implementation in `btcd` can be found here:
>>   * https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/pull/2413
>>
>> --Laolu
>>
>